Sensors and Systems
Breaking News
Draper Unveils LiDAR with MEMS Beamsteering Technology for Autonomous Vehicles
Rating12345LiDAR, short for light detection and ranging, is often...
Matterport Enables Interactive 3D Measurements for Its Spatial Data Platform
Rating12345SUNNYVALE, Calif. – Matterport, the market leader for spatial data...
SPIDA® Software Reveals SPIDAcalc v7.2 – Arrow – Featuring SPIDAstudio Integration Enhancements for the Strategic Management of Asset Lifecycle Data
Rating12345Utilities and Telecommunication companies often have limited key asset...
  • Rating12345

Perspectives Header

Both GPS and aerial-satellite sen­sors are used to gen­er­ate data suit­able for cre­at­ing a dig­i­tal ter­rain model (DTM). In the case of GPS, a series of points are mea­sured through tri­an­gu­lat­ing sig­nals orig­i­nat­ing from a series of GPS satel­lites. Alter­na­tively, aerial-satellite plat­forms that include sen­sors, such Lidar, radar or even using pho­togram­me­try tech­niques may also be used to gen­er­ate a DTM. When is it bet­ter to gen­er­ate a DTM from GPS tech­nolo­gies as com­pared to aer­ial or satel­lite sensing?

Many peo­ple depend upon a dig­i­tal ter­rain model for a num­ber of dif­fer­ent rea­sons. Ele­va­tion mea­sure­ment of the earth’s sur­face is an inte­gral piece of infor­ma­tion. Flood map­ping depends upon cor­rect ele­va­tion data. It helps us to under­stand where ris­ing water lev­els will appear and pro­vides valu­able infor­ma­tion for emer­gency plan­ning and response. Know­ing the ele­va­tion sup­ports deter­mi­na­tion of aspect (north-south-east-west) of a given point, thus know­ing where the sun will shine or not, the wind will occur mostly, as well as the suit­abil­ity of a par­tic­u­lar land use — par­tic­u­larly for agri­cul­tural, con­struc­tion or trans­port. Obvi­ously trains can­not run up or down fifty degree slopes, for example.

Tra­di­tion­ally ele­va­tion has been mea­sured by run­ning  a tra­verse across the land, care­fully cal­cu­lat­ing ele­va­tion of a series of each point rel­a­tive to known bench­mark ele­va­tions. By tying these tra­verse points to well-known sur­vey con­trol points whose ele­va­tion is known, a coor­di­nated sys­tem could be cal­cu­lated with both newly acquired sur­vey data in addi­tion to already exist­ing measurements.

The same prin­ci­ple applies to aer­ial sens­ing for pho­togram­me­try pur­poses whereby flight plan­ning often entails deter­min­ing flight lines (where the air­craft will fly) to avoid exces­sive over­lap (side­lap, end­lap) and boundaries.

Thus flight lines are inter­preted sim­i­larly to ground tran­sect lines with infor­ma­tion gath­ered along them using either GPS on the ground or aer­ial cam­eras from an air­plane — two dif­fer­ent tech­niques and approaches.

On the other hand, satel­lite In the case of GPS, advanced tech­niques are often used and this may include GPS net­works. For exam­ple, the Ord­nance Sur­vey in the UK oper­ates a GPS net­work across the coun­try — as do many other coun­tries. The results of mea­sure­ments using GPS tech­niques can often be bet­ter than half a meter and may approach cen­time­ters in most cases. This is also true for aer­ial gath­ered data using dig­i­tal pho­togram­me­try tech­niques. Satel­lite sen­sors can also acquire ele­va­tion data with a high level of accu­racy and precision.

But can we sep­a­rate one tech­nol­ogy from another for a given appli­ca­tion? For national or broad regional ques­tions that demand sim­i­lar data across long dis­tances, it is often imprac­ti­cal to start build­ing a grid­ded net­work of GPS points. If the points are widely sep­a­rated, then the derived ter­rain model may not rep­re­sent undu­la­tions and changes occur­ring between mea­sured points accurately.

Con­versely, aer­ial or satel­lite gen­er­ated DTM infor­ma­tion may include costs that are pro­hib­i­tive to their use, par­tic­u­larly for small and inter­me­di­ate sized com­pa­nies. I have heard this stated many times.

But the fact is, peo­ple do not use DTM’s alone. They are usu­ally cou­pling them to other goals and pur­poses asso­ci­ated in their projects. It is not uncom­mon to see other sen­sors, often expen­sive and demand­ing a high degree of knowl­edge for their oper­a­tion and can be used together with topog­ra­phy. In some instances sen­sors that mea­sure radi­ance, salin­ity, aerosols, traf­fic and other appli­ca­tion types may include spa­tial pro­cess­ing that is depen­dent upon topography.

Did you know that about 18% of top US farm pro­duc­ers are pro­duc­ing about 72% of that coun­tries corn? These are the alpha or early adopters in the agri-food pro­duc­tion cycle. While the geospa­tial has at times dis­missed the agri­cul­tural com­mu­nity for more lucra­tive waters, the fact remains, this core group (and they exist around the world), base their deci­sions on sci­ence, knowl­edge and new tools. They achieve effi­cien­cies and aim for them, and they ben­e­fit from the returns.

This group of peo­ple under­stand that food pro­duc­tion is a series of processes, much like con­struct­ing a build­ing, and they cou­ple topog­ra­phy into quite a few of these processes, from seed­ing to man­age­ment to dis­tri­b­u­tion and mar­ket­ing. They are pur­su­ing ‘whole plant sys­tem agri­cul­ture’ that effec­tively ties 3D into the pro­duc­tion cycle as they develop sus­tain­able agri­cul­tural systems.

These sys­tems are com­plex, but the drift towards sim­plic­ity is enabling these changes while main­tain­ing the real com­plex­ity under-the-hood.

This poses unique chal­lenges for the GPS indus­try in agri­cul­ture, since laser remote sens­ing and radar can effec­tively pro­vide a more densely mea­sured topo­graphic net­work. How­ever, the role of GPS is about to change and become more tightly cou­pled to sec­ondary sen­sors and other tech­nolo­gies that sup­port the dig­i­tal farm and whole plant agri­cul­ture in 3D. That 18% or alpha group is lead­ing the way in terms of tech­nol­ogy use and appli­ca­tion. They are found in areas like wines, grains, hay, beans and fruit pro­duc­tion. Their work will lead towards higher trace­abil­ity, greater food secu­rity, more effi­cient processes for pro­duc­tion and include dis­tri­b­u­tion and eco­nomic net­works linked directly to bank­ing and finance.

Is aer­ial sens­ing or GPS more effec­tive for topog­ra­phy appli­ca­tions? In many ways topog­ra­phy is a key ele­ment that will play a major role in the upcom­ing 3D agri­cul­ture future. Imag­ing sen­sors will mon­i­tor pro­duc­tion and also pro­vide valu­able infor­ma­tion. I sus­pect that the sweet spot in all of this will be the point where GPS and topo­graphic tech­nolo­gies con­verge to sup­port agri­cul­tural processes more effec­tively. This is dif­fer­ent than pro­vid­ing tech­nol­ogy alone, it requires an under­stand­ing of how the early adopter agri­cul­tural com­mu­nity really see agri­cul­ture in the future.

While the 3D build­ing envi­ron­ment is pur­su­ing 3D BIM and other appli­ca­tions, an anal­ogy can be drawn, closely, to what farm­ers are think­ing about under­ground in terms of roots and how they gauge land tenure, oper­a­tions, pro­duc­tion and main­te­nance over the sus­tain­abil­ity cycle.

— —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  — —

Jeff Thurston is edi­tor and co-founder of V1 Mag­a­zine. He is based in Berlin.

 


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *